@moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
·
Mar 30, 2026
Solarbird 
@moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
Bluesky user? Read: http://mastodon.murkworks.net/@moira/113647708264029959 She/her ex-software dev; writer of words for money, fun, and survival both here & at my blog; maker of bike maps, printables, radio noise (KK7ZLU), baked goods, & random projects. Republicans have tried to kill off me & mine my whole life; if you hate "Dems" & "libs" more than actual fash, DNI & GFY. Support me or my Mastodon instance: http://patreon.com/solarbird https://justmytoots.com/@moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
mastodon.murkworks.net
I did not know about iron-filing-embedded PLA which is both magnet-compatible and will _actively rust_. This is stupidly cool:
https://youtu.be/7DZ8gtORx-Y?t=2214
There's a time start on that link, the embed probably won't honour it? But skip to 36:54, it's neat.
#3dPrinting #PLA
0
0
0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Amendment#Pla…
…gov.au/…/which-platforms-are-age-restricted
eSafety does not have a formal role in declaring which services are age-restricted social media platforms. In the absence of any rules made by the Minister of Communications specifying a service is either an age-restricted social media platform or not an age-restricted social media platform, any determination that a service is or is not an age-restricted social media platform is a matter for the court.
Services which do not currently meet the definition of ‘age-restricted social media platform’ should routinely self-assess, including when introducing a new social feature or function or when observing changes in the ways existing and new account holders are using their service.
So technically they need to self-assess based on the legislation, but based on the published lists I really doubt they have anything to worry about.
10
1
0
You've seen all posts