@theregister@geeknews.chat @lproven@social.vivaldi.net I think that is bad and @linuxfoundation@social.lfx.dev should not have caved in on said pressure but stricly banned #AIslop contributions and treated it like they treated malicious contributions the same way #Valve deals with #Cheaters!
Plus the removal of #i486 support is IMHO bad because it was fine and shpuld've been left in.And I'm not just complaining because I maintain a #minimalist distro (@OS1337@infosec.space) that targets i486 (SX), like #Vortex86…
0
0
0
1
0
0
@pertho@mastodon.bsd.cafe @rootwyrm@weird.autos yes and if the sole reason for @OS1337@infosec.space was to use dd & ddrescue on some industrial thingy that runs #MSDOS then yeah that would be fine.
I just think that yeeting i486 is wrong cuz #i486 requires way less workarounds than #i386 to work wellCuz yes there are still new machines deployed with i486-only #CPU|s / #SoC|s in #industrial setups!
0
1
0
@rootwyrm@weird.autos Worse even: #Linux planning to kill #i486SX / #i486 support is a huge blow.to #embedded & #industrial systems!
3
3
2
You've seen all posts