#gaad

2 posts · Last used 3d

Back to Timeline
zersiax
@zersiax@cupoftea.social · 3d ago
Ok I am truly sorry to be that guy. BUT: Can we PLEASE, leave the "#AI improves #accessibility" talks to people who actually benefit from #accessibility? I see SO MANY articles, On LinkedIn, on Slack, on Medium, about how AI improves #accessibility metrics, compliance, automates all the things. Newsflash: your metrics are likely incomplete or inconclusive, compliance is at best an illusory snapshot, and automation for #accessibility is still a pipe dream, and that's coming from someone who actually uses these tools OUTSIDE a presentation room. I don't care if you're #microsoft, #salesforce or whichever other big name that makes you feel authoritative. You're wrong, sorry to say. Want ACTUAL stories from ACTUAL people using #AI to improve #accessibility? Hire me and I'll talk your ear off. That's been me for months now. Don't want to, right before #GAAD? Welp ... that tells its own story then, doesn't it?
20
0
27
In reply to
zersiax
@zersiax@cupoftea.social · 3d ago

Want a freebie? Sure, I can do that!

  1. Can #AI improve accessibility on the web? - Yeah probably.
  2. Can it do it without supervision? - No. It almost habitually screws up the simplest of things because the training data is you lot’s semantically terrible code. :P
  3. Can it save time in making things accessible? - Yeah, provided someone competent is at the helm, see also q2.
  4. DO humans need to be in the loop? - yes, see q2.
  5. Are random big-tech officials making (generating?) 50-minute presentations to augment the echo chamber of this being a solved problem full of it? - That would be a yes.
  6. Are they actually causing harm by not actually including the audience they are claiming to help? - Absolutely, please stop f*ing doing that.
  7. Is this a terrible look near #GAAD where we need to convince others we care about #accessibility for one day of the year? - oh yeah.
11
0
15

You've seen all posts